Why Can’t we Remember the Books we Read - The Writers For Hire

WHY CAN’T WE REMEMBER THE BOOKS WE READ? You know you read the book. You can even remember where you bought it, where you were when you were reading it, and what the cover of the book looked like. What you can’t remember, though, is the actual book itself. But, why is that? This fascinating piece by The Atlantic explains how our brains have a â€Å"forgetting curve† when it comes to retaining details about the books we read, movies we watch, or things we see on the internet. They go on to further explain that while we are able to remember things that are important to our everyday lives, our brains recognize that things like details from books and movies are not things that are vital for us to store in our memory. After all, those are things that we can easily refer back to, if needed, by re-reading the book or re-watching the movie. While it may appear that things like books, movies, and the internet are dumbing us down by allowing us to store our memories externally, it seems that the internet age has really just caused our brains to re-prioritize the things that we remember. So, instead of trying to remember the details of the book we read 6-months ago, our brains are able to focus on more important things.

Free Essays on The Death Of The Profane

Too Hot To Handle â€Å"The Death Of The Profane† is an exert from The Alchemy of Race and Right, written by Patricia J. Williams. She is a professor of law at Columbia University. The argument is valid, however she makes quick judgments, and goes so in depth regarding the legalities of telling her story, her reason for telling the story is lost. The story begins in 1986, while shopping in Soho. She was denied admittance to a store and was told they were closed. Since it was 1:00p.m. this was untrue. She assumed the reason she was being turned away was because of her skin color. She is so enraged she wants to break through the window. Quickly she accused the white teen-aged clerk of being, â€Å"narrow-eyed†, as well as a, â€Å"sales child†. She hung a poster telling her tale in the window of the store when it was truly closed. This was a way of exercising her first amendment right. The second attempt to tell her story did not go well. After the editing process, all of her fury, the store’s name, and even her race had been erased. She was told it was, â€Å"against ‘editorial policy’†. She was enraged, and eventually convinced the editors that mention of her race was essential to the story. She then told her tale at a law-school conference. This time she also told of her troubles while trying to have her story printed. Overall, this is a justifiable argument, worth telling. However, the author is too bias for her own good, and her quick, fiery attitude prevents the telling of her story to go more smoothly.... Free Essays on The Death Of The Profane Free Essays on The Death Of The Profane Too Hot To Handle â€Å"The Death Of The Profane† is an exert from The Alchemy of Race and Right, written by Patricia J. Williams. She is a professor of law at Columbia University. The argument is valid, however she makes quick judgments, and goes so in depth regarding the legalities of telling her story, her reason for telling the story is lost. The story begins in 1986, while shopping in Soho. She was denied admittance to a store and was told they were closed. Since it was 1:00p.m. this was untrue. She assumed the reason she was being turned away was because of her skin color. She is so enraged she wants to break through the window. Quickly she accused the white teen-aged clerk of being, â€Å"narrow-eyed†, as well as a, â€Å"sales child†. She hung a poster telling her tale in the window of the store when it was truly closed. This was a way of exercising her first amendment right. The second attempt to tell her story did not go well. After the editing process, all of her fury, the store’s name, and even her race had been erased. She was told it was, â€Å"against ‘editorial policy’†. She was enraged, and eventually convinced the editors that mention of her race was essential to the story. She then told her tale at a law-school conference. This time she also told of her troubles while trying to have her story printed. Overall, this is a justifiable argument, worth telling. However, the author is too bias for her own good, and her quick, fiery attitude prevents the telling of her story to go more smoothly....